VIP Abuse Investigations Reorganise

I’m a bit late with this; a recent statement from the Metropolitan Police concerning investigations of “VIP paedophilia” allegations:

…as Operations Midland and Fairbank have progressed officers identified a number of people and locations that were common to both enquiries. It is therefore operationally important to have the same officer in charge of these enquiries.

…Detective Superintendent [Angela] Scott, who is based within the Sexual Offences, Exploitation and Child Abuse (SOECA) Command, will oversee the work of officers from the Homicide and Major Crime Command, Directorate of Professional Standard and SOECA.

…To date the MPS has received 48 allegations of historical impropriety by police officers dealing with sexual abuse, during the period of 1970 to 2005. 

Although the police keep insisting that “we are not prepared to give a running commentary”, several statements relating to this story have now been released. I previously discussed one that appeared last month, and again more recently a few days ago.

Operation Midland was created due to clams made by “Nick”, who alleged not just paedophilia but also three murders; as such, it was treated separately from Operation Fairbank, which was set up to deal with “Non Recent Allegations of Child Abuse”.

Two of these murders supposedly took place at sex parties, while a third involved a boy who was run down in the street in Kingston-on-Thames in 1979. However, “Nick” is unable to remember the boy’s full name, there are no records of such an event, and no-one remembers it ever happening. For this, and other reasons, “Nick’s” credibility is now severely undermined, and it is no surprise that the police have reeled back from their initial (and, in some quarters, much derided) “credible and true” assessment.

The obvious inference from the above is that the merger is a device with which to wind down Midland with minimal embarrassment. I have three observations:

(1) It was known from Day One that there were “a number of people and locations that were common to both enquiries”, given the other “Westminster” accusers; this is not something that came to light during the investigations;

(2) although there is a reference to “Homicide and Major Crime Command”, it is not made clear whether this is a continuing homicide investigation;

(3) the emphasis has now changed from the testimonies of alleged abuse victims to that of ex-police. The fact that officers are mentioned in the statement is an implicit admission that this is firmer ground.

I agree that these “48 allegations” remain a loose end, although it’s not clear how many relate directly to the “Westminster” claims, and there’s a troubling slippage in “officers dealing with sexual abuse” rather than “officers dealing with allegations of sexual abuse” – just because a procedure was not followed properly, that does not mean that someone is guilty. However, even if anything of substance does emerge from these lines of enquiry, it will not remove the difficulties with “Nick’s” testimony – and it should be remembered that rumours about Dolphin Square and Elm Guest House have been in the public domain for years.

Other general loose ends have also been put forward by the journalist David Hencke. Hencke draws attention to claims that residents living near the Elm Guest House saw “children going into the guest house”, “posh chauffeur driven cars drawing up there”, and a visit by Leon Brittan.

Hencke accuses David Aaronovitch of over-emphasising the role of Chris Fay in promoting the Elm Guest House allegations; Fay, a former social worker who claims to have seen evidence, has been quoted in the media for a while, but only recently has it been widely noted that a few years ago he served a prison sentence for fraud (although the detail has been in the public domain for some time). However, whatever the strength of other lines of evidence, this pertinent information has somehow failed to appear on news sites publicising the allegations – most notably, Exaro News – and this has been a major failing.

Hencke warns:

Finally it will be a little premature to assume that the Elm Guest House investigation is over. It is not. There are links to the Operation Midland investigation and there are a number of unfinished leads. But that would be tantamount to speculating on a current police investigation.

Given Exaro‘s aggressive advocacy on behalf of accusers, this admonition against “speculating on a current police investigation” is very hard to take.

UPDATE 2019: “Nick” has now been revealed to be a man named Carl Beech. His allegations have been comprehensively exposed as lies, and he has been found guilty of perverting the course of justice and fraud. He was also found to be in possession of a collection of child-abuse images, and to have used a hidden camera to film the teenage friend of his son using a toilet. For more, see here.

9 Responses

  1. You are totally wrong about all of this. What you do not seem to understand is that over half of the Midland enquiry was/is, ‘not in the public domain’.
    Other places and other people are involved, also not in the public domain. The investigation remains very much a ‘murder inquiry’.

    • David is fond of stating that other people are unequivocally wrong whilst alluding to secret information that, though not in the public domain, is known to him! As he previously wrote:

      “I learned two things. One was that I was referred to as a,‘nutter’ by Detectives at Kensington, and the other was that my,‘information, had been sent on to the Midland Enquiry!!!”

      I see no reason to dispute the opinion reached by the police.

      • That last year. After April this year, when they were unable to check on the very detailed, and specific information I had given them. After April this year they were able to check, and are still doing so.

      • Bandini is fond of supporting right wing MPs who have got away with abuse in the past. He has an agenda of stopping all enquiries into Tory MPs, and other VIPs who support the Tory Party.

      • Yes, David, you have mentioned repeatedly the claim that something changed after April & that we’ll just have to take your word for it!

        There are many reasons not to take you seriously – being labelled a “nutter” by the police who had to go through your ‘bag of evidence’ but one of them. (Another is that you claim that Chris Fay’s Elm ‘guestlist’ is “the Holy Grail”!).

        That you state I support right-wingers & that have “an agenda of stopping all enquiries” is further evidence, if any were needed, that you are off with the fairies (or are you just rounding them up?!?).

        Your great contribution will certainly be welcomed by overtime-hungry coppers tasked with wading through your ‘dossier’, though!

      • Yes they do have a lot of work on their hands, as my investigations were done over a period of five years. Even though I have done most of the groundwork, everything will, no doubt, have to be re-checked.

        Your support of right wing VIPs is very touching, but will not help them to keep their secrets.

  2. A five year long investigation, eh, David? That’s strange, as you previously wrote that it was by accident “last year” (i.e. 2014) that you stumbled upon some “murder”. You went on to write:

    “I know nothing about these people, other that what I have read, or heard on the grape vine. In fact when I reported things, no one had heard of Nick, including me. I knew nothing of the complaints against HP, as those things were not in the news at that time. I knew nothing of Chris Fay, or Elm Guest House, in fact none of these people even came on my radar. Even Exaro was a news feed that I did not know about.”

    I’m puzzled by the nature of your epic slog & how you somehow managed not to bump into any of the above during it – but I think I’ve humoured you enough, so goodbye once again!

    • Bandini Everything I have said makes sense, to everyone,Barristers included. Everyone except you apparently. You seem incapable of reading ‘between the lines’, and have to have everything ‘spelled out ‘ for you.
      You seem to have been educated, but education is not intelligence. You have learned by rote, parrot fashion, and can regurgitate facts, like a parrot, but you seem to be incapable of ‘original thought’, which is the true sign of intelligence.
      Looking through your posts, I only see facts, learned from others, but no original material!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.