A Note on the Daily Mail, Colin Stagg, Operation Midland and the Metropolitan Police

From the Daily Mail, a week ago:

Colin Stagg is now 57, greying and portlier than when he hit the headlines in the early 1990s, but there is no mistaking his features as he heads to his local Tesco Express for his checkout shift.

He was the innocent loner targeted in a police honey trap involving a blonde undercover officer whose mission was to get him to ‘confess’ to a murder he did not commit.

Mr Stagg never admitted killing Rachel Nickell, 23 – stabbed 49 times in front of her young son Alex on Wimbledon Common in July 1992 – and there was no worthwhile evidence against him, but police still charged him with her murder.

…For now, friends say he is simply getting on with his life after being the victim of one of Scotland Yard’s most disgraceful investigations in which – as in the more recent shambolic VIP child abuse inquiry Operation Midland – the presumption of innocence was not adhered to by police.

Stagg’s current circumstances are deemed newsworthy due to an upcoming Channel 4 drama about the case. The reference to Operation Midland, though, links the the story to the paper’s ongoing series of articles about fall-out from the Carl Beech fiasco.

In recent weeks the paper has returned to claims that Operation Midland search warrants were obtained unlawfully by the Met by misleading a judge, and it has highlighted that two unnamed false accusers who hitched their wagon to Beech’s star at a time when the Met had declared his allegations to be “credible and true” have not faced any action against them (an outcome that is currently being investigated by Merseyside Police). There has also been a piece on “bombshell emails” detailing how Cressida Dick, who currently heads the Met (although that may change very soon after last night’s incident on Clapham Common), “was shielded by her colleagues”, and an article denouncing the appointment of former Met chief Bernard Hogan-Howe (now Lord Hogan-Howe) “to carry out an external review of a major police database blunder.”

However, the description of what happened to Colin Stagg as being “of one of Scotland Yard’s most disgraceful investigations” comes over as somewhat unreflective given how tabloids including the Mail persecuted him after his trial collapsed in 1994 – an outcome that was less than an exoneration until the actual killer was identified several years later. Here’s Nick Cohen, writing in the Observer in 2006:

The worst of it was that the police and media persuaded the family of Rachel Nickell that the crucial difference between Stagg and [Myra] Hindley was that Stagg had got away with murder. The News of the World ran lipsmacking pieces on how the ‘weirdo’ demanded ‘bizarre sex’ with his ‘terrified’ girlfriend yards from where Rachel Nickell was murdered. The Daily Mail quoted Andre Hanscombe, father of her son, saying he was ’99 per cent certain’ that Stagg was guilty and the government should remove the double jeopardy law so he could be tried again. It also ran a serialisation of a self-justificatory book by the officer in charge of the case, Detective Inspector Keith Pedder, headlined ‘How British Justice Betrayed Rachel’s Son’.

All the harassment and the tub-thumping, the misleading of Rachel Nickell’s family and the denigration by the judge was in vain; a vast exercise in distraction left the real killer free to commit other crimes.

Cohen’s article is headlined “With police and tabloids in cahoots, Colin Stagg became a sacrificial lamb”. That cosiness apparently came to an end when the Metropolitan Police began investigating tabloid phone-hacking; thus the Mail‘s right-wing polemicist Richard Littlejohn, reacting to the paper’s recent articles on Operation Midland, last month linked the case to “the Gestapo tactics the Old Bill used against journalists accused of phone-hacking and paying public servants for information” (1).

I wrote more about the investigation into Stagg here.


1. Journalistic hostility to the Met, though, did not inhibit the paper’s hatchet-man Guy Adams from in 2019 referring online to former Chief Constable of Wiltshire Police Mike Veale as “carrot-cruncher”, shortly after an ITV dramatization of the Levi Bellfield case revealed that “carrot” is an derisive nickname used within the Metropolitan Police to refer to officers from other forces.

One Response

  1. Hi Richard,

    Again you have left out the most crucial piece of information for your readers relating to the persecution of Colin Stagg and which underpinned the entire Police case.

    Stagg was arrested in 1993 right in the middle of the Satanic Ritual Abuse Myth hysteria. He was arrested because the biased and prejudiced police had discovered that he was a Pagan and their ignorance over what Neo-Pagans believe made them suspect that the vicious and violent stabbing of Rachell Nickell was a case of Satanic Ritual Abuse.

    Without doubt those completely unfounded suspicions were put there by the coterie of SRAhunters who had started the Satanic Panic in 1990. At that precise moment they were anxious about the imminent publication of the government’s definitive report on SRA being then undertaken by professor Jean La Fontaine. Most of the key Satan Hunters had been interviewed by La Fontaine and her questioning of the false allegations had put them into a spin. They were in fact collectively arranging a very well planned and concerted campaign to counteract/nullify the government’s report which went into action before publication to steal the report’s thunder. On 26th May 1994 whilst Stagg was on remand in prison, three SRA-aligned MPs (including Geoffrey Dickens) headed a press conference at the House of Commons where main players revivified the old claims and newspaper reported ‘Devil Cults Slay 100’ (Daily Mirror). Prior to this other key players had primed the national press with separate articles, false claims and sensational stories. Upon the publication of the La Fontaine report
    on 2nd June 1994 the same people jumped to attack it (Listen, courtesy of the SAFF to the Today R4 programme of that date here:


    Staggs trial was held on 14th Sept 1994 and the prosecution halted because of the extensive ‘entrapment’ activities of the police which involved an under-cover policewoman pretending to be a Pagan and enticing Stagg by urging him to fulfill his imagined ‘sexual perversions’.

    Despite the clear link with the SRA hysteria, despite no actual evidence of any kind linking Stagg with the killing, despite him spending a year in jail, and despite him being exonerated when it came to trial he was consistently pilloried in the British Press with guilty inuendos for years afterwards. When he received 750,000 compensation (a clear indication of innocence and harm done) he was again pilloried by the press as though he somehow didn’t deserve it because he was actually guilty after all!

    A detailed legal analysis of the Rachel Nickell case and how the police chose to fit-up an innocent man using SRA claims because they were under pressure fromthe media to produce ‘a result’, is outlined in the following 2012 paper by Australian Judge J C Gibson and which can be seen in its entirety here;


    The paper includes images of atrocious media coverage of the case and other important information. However, as in Richard;s analysis it also fails in acknowledging the fact that Stagg was a PAGAN and that his despised religious beliefs were used by prejudiced police and prosecutors to frame an innocent man because of the climate of hysteria about Satanic Abuse at the time.

    Please make sure you all make a note of this fact in future.

    John Freedom


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.