A Note on Tommy Robinson vs Panorama

From UKIP leader Gerard Batten on Twitter, last week:

Tommy Robinson is going to reveal how the BBC’s Panorama set out to frame him in its ‘Tommy Takedown’ programme. He has undercover evidence proving a ‘fake news’ scandal that will shock the nation. He says he will reveal all on 23rd Feb. My advice to him is don’t wait, do it now.

Such an extended delay raises the suspicion that Robinson is more interested in hyping his material rather than relying on the substance of it – by the time we get to 23 February his supporters will be so invested in the eagerly anticipated exposé (entitled Panodrama) that its status as a devastating revelation will be an article of faith whether or not it delivers on Robinson’s promises.

In the meantime, though, Robinson has trailed a couple of segments on his Facebook page, derived from undercover recordings of Panorama journalist John Sweeney apparently in conversation with informants known to Robinson. In one of these, Sweeney talks about how unusual it is to have working-class people as guests on BBC Newsnight, and he recalls going out for a drink with one because of the novelty of it. Warming to an anthropological analogy, he perhaps infelicitously says that he undertook this foray like “the way that you would do with somebody, from the, you know a cannibal from… Amazonia or maybe a creature from outer space”. Inevitably, Robinson has presented this as evidence that Sweeney regards working-class people as being “like cannibals”.

The second segment shows Sweeney acting out Private Eye magazine’s golden age of Fleet Street character Lunchtime O’Booze, quaffing his way through an array of beverages at an extravagant liquid lunch for two and ostentatiously charging £220 to expenses. This might reasonably be considered a misuse of money raised by the BBC licence fee, both because of the bill itself and because Sweeney was unlikely to be of much use to his employer for the rest of the day. This was an unnecessary embarrassment, which raises general questions about the privileges and leeway enjoyed by celebrity journalists at the BBC and perhaps elsewhere (and, given the excessive consumption, whether the BBC has a duty of care to an employee with an addiction).

Some of Robinson’s supporters meanwhile are supplementing these clips with Sweeney’s infamous 2007 “exploding tomato” routine, in which he was goaded into yelling at a Scientology spokesperson during a previous investigation (discussed by me here). In both instances, it seems to me, Sweeney underestimated his quarry.

Robinson claims that his video will reveal attempts to “blackmail” associates into making false claims against him, and he has highlighted Panorama‘s partnership with Hope Not Hate, which has the franchise as the official face of anti-extremist activism in UK, notwithstanding some methodological criticisms and other concerns. He also claims that staff working on the Panorama documentary informally referred to it as the “Tommy Takedown”, thus indicating bias. It seems to me that it is always worth questioning why a particular news documentary is made at any particular time, but this does not mean it lacks value or legitimacy. For instance, I was very pleased when Panorama discredited the buffoonish MP Patrick Mercer, but I still wonder why exactly he was targeted when he was.

Currently, Robinson’s clips of Sweeney are being ignored by the mainstream media – naturally, however, articles have appeared on Breitbart, and there is also a write-up in Czech that has been posted to Filip Vávra’s Středoevropan website. The Sun, in contrast, has published self-recorded clips of Robinson in Bologna last month drunkenly boasting that he can score drugs and describing a taxi as “a little Paki that drives a car”. In a Facebook video, Robinson has dismissed all this as harmless banter with Asian friends, and suggested that the clips have appeared in response to his plans to expose Panorama. (1)

Anti-BBC activists on the right are likely to promote Robinson’s work, thus mainstreaming him further – and his clips have also been highlighted opportunistically by the self-described police whistleblower Jon Wedger, who wrote on Twitter that “I feel the BBC need to do more to expose an establishment cover up. Especially in relation to former PM Edward Heath”. (2)


1. Intriguingly, Robinson also says that he “had a meeting this week with a bishop”.

2. Wedger is currently attempting to revive lurid allegations against Heath that were done to death and found wanting between 2015 and 2017, perhaps in order to ingratiate himself with Mike Veale. Wedger also clarifies that “I don’t like Tommy for many reasons but I do like that he’s gone undercover at Panorama”. However, one video promoted on his website is titled “Insight UK Column – Support for Tommy Robinson”.

The conspiracy milieu in general has grudge against Panorama after it debunked specific “Westminster VIP” child-sex abuse allegations in 2015. However, some of the BBC’s output has been more credulous: most notoriously, Newsnight‘s botched segment on Bryn Estyn in late 2012, and in 2015 Becky Milligan’s “David’s Story” segments for BBC Radio 4’s The World at One.

11 Responses

  1. We all know that the BBC is for gender-benders, Child Molesters (Sir Jimmy Saville) and Mohammed; so there is nothing new here: but we wish Mr Tommy Robinson well in all further exposures of the BBC. They are not very keen on a real Brexit either.

  2. Why are you playing this down? This is massive! Why is this not front page news?

    • I don’t believe it is. Panorama will be making the programme to make a point, I have seen this first hand before. It is being hyped, as this article points out, just to get Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon maximum exposure. If he had any real clout it would be revealed immediately.

  3. Here’s some inside info. Tommy only concluded his filming on Friday the 8th Feb with his reverse sting on BBC Panorama crew: they came to his location to interview him, he showed them his undercover footage and they were astonished, shocked and horrified.

    Simultaneously Tommy’s lawyers threatened the BBC and the BBC have now withdrawn their Panorama “documentary” from broadcast. It was meant to be the centrepiece of Hope not Hate’s “state of the far-right” report media blitz this week. Having seen Tommy’s lawyer’s letter I can understand the panic at the BBC.

    The delay between Feb 8th and 23rd is simply to give Tommy time to film supporting explanations and edit many hours of footage into a coherent explanation. Something even the BBC would take many weeks to do with their unlimited financial resources.

    • The BBC are disgusting: they promote folk like Sir Jimmy Saville and Gary Glitter, tell us that England is hideously English, that Islam is a religion of peace; and they have done nothing to protect child safety in our northern towns.

    • I wonder if the ironically named “Hope Not Hate” or any of the the other bodies or people that associate Yaxley-Robinson and similar with the ““far right” would care (dare?) to provide an explanatory “far left” to “far right spectrum chart educating us on where exactly “Tommeh” should appear on it as well as Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, and Salazar.

      They should also, of course, show Stalin, Lenin, Trotsky, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, and all their favourite South American and African politicians, as well as current UK and European ones.

      And, naturally, show their working and explain their thinking!

  4. I watched this whole program where it seems he has proved that Panorama / John Sweeney / Hope Not Hate basically things up. And in Sweeneys case blatantly lied on camera.
    Add on top of this Sweeneys racist, sexist, homophobic comments – and I fail to see how Panorama can come back from this – which is a shame

    • The BBC tried to frame Nick Griffin of the British National Party back in 2005. We should not be surprised at wickedness in high steads: the Pharisees tried to frame the Lord Jesus Christ; and for a while, they succeeded – but then came the resurrection. I am not suggesting that Nick Griffin is on a par with the Lord, but there are parallels in how good causes are treated by the wicked and unrighteous.

  5. John Sweeney was telling Lucy Brown what he wanted from her for the Panorama interview when they were in the pub. He said himself he wasn’t supposed to be doing that. That was quite damning against BBC journalism IMO.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.