• First published in 2004 as Bartholomew’s Notes on Religion (BNOR).

    Previously at:
    blogs.salon.com/0003494
    barthsnotes.wordpress.com

    Email me
    (Non-commercial only)

  • Archives

  • Twitter

  • Supporting

  • Recent comments

Caldwell

caldwell

Why are scientists refusing to take seriously a lawyer who wants his “non-religious” objections to evolutionary theory included in school science classes? What makes them think they know more about science than he does? WorldNetDaily has the story, while a teacher involved in the dispute gives his account here.

UPDATE: Pharyngula (third item) links to the Discovery Institute’s pdf of Caldwell’s complaint. Caldwell has enlisted Phil Skell, a Chemistry professor who recently sent lengthly emails to Pharyngula in which he proudly displayed his stupidity. See here and here.

One Response

  1. Didn’t our Preteldent warn us that all those Trahl Lawrs are trying to destroy America?

    I notice the ad doesn’t say whether or not he is certified by the Board of Legal Specialization as a bona fide expert in Religious Shystering.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.